"Anti Cellulite reduction devices and gadgets have no
cellulite removal effects beyond draining womens'' checking
accounts or jacking up their credit cards."

This is the strong opinion of skeptics and medical experts.
And their viewpoint carries substantial evidence. They also
point to the fact that specific anti-cellulite exercises
are the only proven way to banish cellulite.

This viewpoint continues to gain support, even though the
desperate market for cellulite fighting products an
services is expected to grow to over 200 million dollars a
year by 2012.

In most of their summary references - these experts do
allude to the fact that the only way to reduce or prevent
the appearance of cellulite is through a properly
structured and targeted exercise routine.

Even though the FDA has technically approved several dozen
types of anti-cellulite gadgets, it only judges them on
whether they provide short-term changes in appearance.
Approvals are not based on actual, structural, long lasting
reductions in cellulite.

"We don't have any third party research data or official
proof about how long the reduction effect lasts," claims an
FDA spokes-person referenced in the well known, Wall Street
Journal in a feature article: "The Latest Cellulite
Treatments Sound Too Smooth to Be True." After reading this
article - it's hard to believe how many women still buy
into these devices and gimmicks.

CST (Cosmetic Surgery Today) details the primary paradox in
this industry of desperation, empty promises and big money:

Most of the anti-cellulite treatment plans require the
woman to commit a series of cellulite reduction treatments
in order to see any substantial changes. For example a
series of about ten visits is the typical, 'initial'
treatment plan, and women are 'advised' to maintain a
sensible diet and healthy lifestyle throughout the
cellulite treatment process.

Skeptics and critics of these beauty-spa/cosmetic
procedures highlight that most treatments, at best, may
only offer short term improvements, and that most are
simply 'jazzed-up' massage sessions that only reduce the
ripples & dimples, and the appearance of cellulite on a
temporary basis - with no lasting improvements.

They also mention that those women who may have experienced
improvements could have done so with properly targeted
exercise alone.

But despite all the evidence of doubt, supporters (mainly
the companies that sell them) of cellulite treatments state
that these non-invasive cellulite treatment procedures are
a viable way to drop a few inches, tighten loose skin and
see changes within 3 - 4 months.

"None of these things has been shown in any definitive,
objective way to offer improvement for cellulite areas,"
states Bob Weiss of the American Society for Dermatologic
Surgery. "If there was proof - women would be going crazy -
and the undeniable proof would be all over the news and
talk shows. There would be no debate."

Cellulite device manufacturers stand behind their
treatments' effectiveness, however many women have been
deeply disappointed. In reader surveys about a few
anti-cellulite devices, just a small fraction of women said
"Yes" to the straight question "Was the money you spent
worth it?"...

- Vela-Shape, 10% - Thermage, 34% (Thermage is a supposed
skin 'tightening' device, but the company has recently
included an anti-cellulite attachment - like on a vacuum
cleaner.)

Other cellulite treatment machines and devices were not
officially rated: Smooth-Shapes from Elemé Medical
Co., Velasmooth, the most recent edition of the 'VelaShape'
from Syneron, The 'Dermosonic' by Sybaritic Co., and
'Endermologie' from L.P.G. Systems out of France.

Dermatologist Avaa Chammbon M.D. of Santa Monica, CA, is
very skeptical about what supposed cellulite removal
treatments can offer. She states the claims of "This
device will get rid of cellulite..." is one of the world's
top lies (costing women millions and millions every year),
very close behind "I'll call you in the morning, I promise
I will."

A more objective viewpoint is offered by Chris Zachary
M.D., chairman of the Dept. of Dermatology at U.C.I. He
claims the dimply fat deposits that frustrate so many women
is just a secondary gender characteristic like breasts and
wider hips that can only be improved with exercises that
enhance the structure of the underlying muscles, below the
superficial dermis (skin) that shows the cellulite dimples
and bumps.

----------------------------------------------------
Visit http://www.CelluliteReductionReport.info right now to
find out more about what cellulite actually is, what really
gets rid of cellulite and why scams do not get rid of it.

EasyPublish this article: http://submityourarticle.com/articles/easypublish.php?art_id=45623